Substituting parties after limitation period ends: AIG Europe Ltd v McCormick Roofing Ltd and another
In AIG Europe Ltd v McCormick Roofing Ltd and another, the High Court provided valuable guidance on how and when the court has jurisdiction to substitute one named claimant for another after the end of a limitation period. In so doing, it has suggested that CPR 19.5(3)(b) may occupy a more significant position than has hitherto been assumed.
To view the full article written by Carlo Taczalski, please see here to be directed to Practical Law UK.
