Anna Laney’s practice centres on construction related matters, whether they be traditional contractors / employers claims, professional negligence disputes or insurance issues. She is also regularly instructed in relation to commercial contractual and tortious matters.
She is an experienced advocate appearing regularly in the High Court and in domestic and international arbitrations as well as within the alternative dispute resolution forums of mediation and adjudication.
Anna has particular expertise in dealing with claims that are highly technical in nature, and enjoys the challenge of grappling with a new discipline of expert evidence – the more obscure the better! She has extensive experience of dealing with delay related claims; and whilst many may consider programming a “dark art”, Anna considers it an opportunity to get to grips with the factual matrix of the case in order to unravel cause and effect, which of itself often provides an important insight into the often hidden issues that are driving the litigation.
Anna understands and appreciates the commercial and practical difficulties that litigation presents, which are all the more acute in the current economic conditions. She takes a pro-active role in the management of cases and is happy to attend client meetings and site views both within the UK and abroad in order to assist her lay and professional clients.
Anna welcomes public access clients.
Anna has experience of both contractual and statutory adjudications with subject matter arising out of construction, engineering and process matters. She has been involved in every stage of the process: drafting referrals and responses, appearing at adjudication hearings and attending upon enforcement proceedings.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting for employer in enforcement hearing where contractor claimed his costs incurred during the adjudication process: Lulu Construction Limited v Mullaley.
- Acting for employer in relation enforcement issues where contractor misrepresented its financial position at the date of contract: Pioneer Cladding Ltd v Graham Construction Ltd.
- Acting for international engineering company in £1.2million adjudication where 100 discrete sub-claims arising out of relocation of car production line: allegations of non-payment relating to scope, and counterarguments of defective and incomplete works and delay.
- Acting for developer / respondent in adjudication seeking payment of final account with arguments over jurisdiction and crystallisation of disputes.
Anna is instructed regularly in relation to substantial disputes, particularly in the Middle East. As regards international arbitration, she has experience of working under both the ICC, IDRC and LCIA Arbitration Rules.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting as junior on behalf of the generator in a dispute arising out of the construction of a power and water plant in Bahrain. Multi-billion dollar claims advanced, including claims for a reduction in the tariff (both water and power), extensive remedial works claimed by the off taker (as opposed to the generator), together with significant counterclaims for unpaid capacity charges. Significant claims in relation to delay, including the impact of the Arab Spring as certain embassies advise their nationals to leave the country.
- In respect of the same project, acting as lead counsel in respect of the claim “down the line” by the Generator against the Contractor, where the arguments need to be effectively reversed.
- Acting as junior in a claim for the equivalent of £500M arising out of a construction project in Dubai, where defective design (undertaken by independent consultants) caused significant delay costs when key parts of the structure proved to be unbuildable.
- Acting as Junior in relation to claim for US$50M arising out a construction project in Bulgaria. Claims relating to both allegedly defective works and significant delay / project cost overruns consequent upon unforeseen ground conditions.
- Acting as junior in claim for US$20M against sub-contractor for wrongful determination of contract relating to construction of a sports complex in Beirut on behalf of UK based main contractor. Delay issues included the use of the site by the army as a gun emplacement.
- Defending £250,000 claim arising out of alleged defective construction of domestic swimming pool hall with arguments over workmanship, design and claims for loss and expense.
- Acting for builder in a claim for £150,000 which arose out of the development / refurbishment of a private property, where issues over form of contract (counterparts did not correspond), claims for additional works, and allegations of defective work and delay.
- Abu Dhabi Investment Company & Others v H Clarkson Ltd & Others  EWHC 1267 (Comm) – Examines nature and extent of directors’ fiduciary duties, misrepresentation and mistake.
Anna has wide experience of acting in construction and engineer disputes both within the UK and overseas.
She acts for employers, contractors, sub-contractors and professionals, representing both claimants and defendants. Anna has dealt with claims for additional and defective work, extensions of time and prolongation, as well as allegations of negligence against construction professionals including architects, quantity surveyors, structural and process engineers.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting for insurer in relation to collapse of a residential development built in a crescent arrangement. Insured was a labour only sub-contractor where competing causes of failure advanced. In addition, allegations about site management and bullying as regards instructions that were given (but not recorded) which were said to be causative of collapse. Claimant sought substantial damages for delay, which were not related to original collapse but need for substantial redesign and/or betterment.
- Acting for insurer in relation to collapse of a listed facade at a prestigious development. Detailed arguments about cause and mode of failure, contributory negligence of Employer’s professional team, and policy coverage issues.
- Acting for consortium in relation to defective design of earthworks by civil engineers resulting in delay and claims for costs of additional works and loss of profits.
- Acting for earthworks contractor in relation to final account claim in respect of a new holiday park; main contractor counterclaiming over £1million for defective works and consequential losses.
- Instructed as junior on a £10million claim for delay and disruption. Acting for piling contractor where main contractor alleged that the secant pile installation and associated ground works were defective.
- Acting for developer against allegedly negligent architect who had failed to convert accurately planning drawings into working drawings: claims for losses arising out of differences between two layouts.
- Acting for contractor where architect’s soundproofing design within blocks of flats was alleged to be negligent; issues about remoteness of damage and disputes about the appropriate remedial scheme.
- Acting for process engineer in a claim relating to the design and construction of a fertilizer process plant in the Philippines, in particular the plant’s performance in certain weather conditions.
- Acting for homeowner in a dispute concerning contracting parties involving allegations of deceit as builder / defendant asserted that he acted as agent for third party.
- Lulu Construction Limited v Mullaley  EWHC 1852 (TCC) – Enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision finding that he had jurisdiction to award costs claimed under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.
- Jockey Club Racecourse Ltd v Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd  4 W.L.R. 43  1 Costs L.R. 123 – Considers the requirements of a valid Part 36 Offer as to liability where quantum uncertain / in dispute.
- Mul v Hutton Construction Ltd  EWHC 1797 (TCC);  All ER (D) 58 (Jun) – Interpretation of “appropriate deduction” for defects under cl 2.30 of JCT Intermediate Form of Contract (2005).
- Glendalough Associated SA v Harris Calnan Construction Co Ltd  EWHC 3142 (TCC);  1WLR 1751 – Concerns seeking injunctions in construction adjudications.
- Pioneer Cladding v John Graham Construction PLC  EWHC 2954 (TCC)  CILL 3445 – Concerns circumstances in which a stay of execution may be granted as regards enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision where a sub-contractor had misled contractor as to its financial health.
- SCI Azure Estates Ltd v Mullen  EWHC 263 (QB) – Examines mechanism of contractual formation, intention to create legal relations and retrospective application of agreement.
- Skanska Construction UK Ltd v Egger Barony Ltd  EWCA Civ 1914, (2003) CILL 1969 (Thorpe LJ, Latham LJ, Lawrence Collins J);  EWCA Civ 501 (Buxton LJ, Dyson LJ, Maurice Kay LJ);  EWHC 284 (TCC), (2005) CILL 2210 (HHJ Wilcox) – Claims and counterclaims arising out of the construction of a wood processing factory in Scotland, including arguments concerning extent of insuring obligations.
Anna has a specialist practice concerning energy production, including power and water plants, wind farms, solar farms and biomass plants. She enjoys the technical challenges that arises, in particular the range of expert evidence that it is necessary to master to understand the minutiae of the plants and their operation.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting for generator in respect of a project for the construction of a Power and Water Plant in Bahrain where allegations of defective/non-compliant plant which gave rise to claims by the off taker for remedial works and/o tariff reductions. Counterclaims centred on the off takers failure to act with good faith. She is also instructed in the claim by the Generator against the contractor (see Arbitration).
- Acting for sub-contractor in relation to pipework installation at a twin-fuel biomass plant.
- Acting for contractor in relation to claim against sub-contractor for defective ‘string’ work at a solar farm.
- Acting for sub-contractor in relation to allegations of defective work in relation to off-shore turbine works at a wind farm.
Anna has experience in a wide range of professional negligence disputes acting both for and against professionals.
Given the construction bias of her practice, Anna has particular expertise in claims involving Architects, Structural Engineers; Civil Engineers; M&E Engineers; Ground Investigation and Site Investigation Reports, Building Surveyors; and Quantity Surveyors. She also has experience of claims involving allegations against solicitors both construction related and involving matters of procedural default.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting for homeowners against an architect who negligently issued a completion certificate having failed to identify a number of serious defects (both structural and architectural).
- Acting for a school in relation to the negligent design and procurement of works for s new cricket pavilion.
- Acting for a contractor in relation to a ground investigation report which failed to identify serious limitations in the ground conditions, which affected the piling design resulting in delay and additional costs where the structural engineers were also alleged to be at fault.
- Acting for a surveyor in relation to a Building Survey where it was alleged he had failed to identify structural defects.
- Upton McGougan Ltd v Bellway Homes Ltd  EWHC 1449 (TCC) – Considers the requirement for particulars of breach to be pleaded where professional negligence is alleged – relationship between statements of case and expert reports.
Anna is instructed regularly by insurers in relation to property damage claims, and she has particular experience in relation to fire and flood claims. She is co-author of Construction Insurance and UK Construction Contracts with Roger ter Haar QC and Marshall Levine, the 3rd Edition.
Examples of recent work include:
- Acting for an insurer in relation to a claim arising out of a fire, where policy issues concerning the insured’s intent as regards redevelopment of the site as at the date of the fire, where issues of fraud arise.
- Acting for insurer in relation to claim for £1.6million where water entered into an electrical cabinet which is alleged to have caused a fire approximately one week later. Arguments about discharge of duty to warn, novus actus interveniens and quantum (in particular betterment).
- Acting for insurer in relation to the successful defence of claim against service engineer whose acts / omissions were alleged to have caused fire. Led by Andrew Bartlett QC.
- Acting for insurer in relation to fire at a converted mill complex, which devastated entire building within hours of propagation. Claim in excess of £8million. Allegations of professional negligence against architect in relation to design (engineered fire solution, and detailing) and against architect and employer’s agent in relation to supervision of works (settled at mediation).
- Acting for insurer in relation to claim for £8million arising out of a fire at a hotel refurbishment that was nearing completion.
- Acting for insurer in relation to claim for £600,000 where damage alleged to have been caused by the negligent design, manufacture and fitting of gas fires in a private London property. Arguments about causation and foreseeability of loss.
- Acting for insurer in relation to flooding of a hotel due to the failure of a push-fit plumbing fitting which resulted in losses in excess of £500,000.
- Amsprop Ltd v ITW Ltd  EWHC 2689 (TCC) – Concerned proof of cause of fire at Hard Rock Café, where competing causes alleged.
- Landfast (Anglia) Ltd v Cameron Taylor One Ltd  EWHC 343 (TCC); 117 Con LR 53 – Concerns recoverability of damages where loss suffered by assignee rather than assignor.
- Anna Laney and Daniel Shaw to lecture at the Department of Engineering at the University of Cambridge
- Crown Office Chambers ranked in Chambers Global 2018 for Construction and Energy & Natural Resources
- Anna Laney to speak at the Young Bar Annual Workshop – The 21st Century Advocate
- Easy Money? Adjudication & Recovery of Party Costs
- Anna Laney writes article for ICES Construction Law Review 2014 entitled ‘Adjudication: Quick & Filthy’
- Adjudication: a Pioneering decision – by Anna Laney October 2013
“Enthusiastic, hard-working and a tremendous team player. She rolls up her sleeves and gets involved. She’s a very effective advocate…Proactive, commercial, clever and resourceful.”
Chambers & Partners UK Bar
“A fabulous lawyer, who is great with clients and very responsive…Great at cutting out the waffle and putting matters in the right order to achieve results in hopeless cases.”
Legal 500, 2017
“She’s quick to identify the commercial issues”; “as well as being a robust advocate she often finds the small point of detail which turns the case.”
Chambers UK 2016
“Her swift focus is unsettling for opponents and commands confidence in her submissions”; “she tailors her approach to the specific case with a view to achieve the best outcome for the client.”
Legal 500 2016
“She is a team player who is robust and decisive and who provides very clear in advice.”
Chambers UK 2015
“Expert across a range of fields, from ground works to engineering”; “a very good communicator who gives clear and straightforward legal advice.”
Legal 500 2015
“Tremendously enthusiastic, she is an energetic, hard-working and effective advocate.”
Chambers UK 2014
“Sharp, authoritative and robust on her feet”; “a tremendous asset”; “a popular choice for construction related arbitrations.”
Legal 500 2014
“An absolutely excellent senior junior. She is always on top of things, has very good tactical sense, and if you see her name on the pleadings you know you’re in for a fight.”
"An absolutely excellent senior junior. She is always on top of things, has very good tactical sense, and if you see her name on the pleadings you know you're in for a fight." Chambers & Partners 2013
“A tremendous asset to any team”; “totally dedicated, utterly dependable, and someone in whom faith can safely be placed.”
Chambers & Partners 2012
“Sources were quick to highlight commerciality as a key attribute…a diligent and proactive senior junior who relates well to lay clients and has a great rapport with judges.”
Chambers & Partners 2011
“Excellent…well respected…no praise is high enough”
Legal 500 2011