Skip to content

News - By: James Medd

Security Door: Work equipment or Workplace?

News | 20th Apr 2018

In Heeds v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police & Another [2018] EWHC 810 (QB) James Medd, instructed by Kennedys, has just successfully resisted a cross-appeal in a case which considered the application of PUWER and the Workplace Regulations to a security door and the Court of Appeal decision in Hide v Steeplechase Company (Cheltenham) Limited.

Ted Baker Plc & Anor v AXA Insurance UK Plc & Ors

News | 30th Oct 2014

Instructed by Kennedys, James Medd has acted as junior Counsel for AXA for over 4 years in the long running insurance policy dispute between AXA and the high class retailer Ted Baker. The dispute arose from multiple thefts of stock by one of Ted Baker’s warehouse staff over the course of several years. In 2012 […]

Continued success for Crown Office Chambers in Chambers UK 2015 Directory

News | 24th Jul 2014

The following members, which includes several new additions, are listed in the 2015 edition of Chambers UK. Silks Richard Lynagh QC – Personal Injury Michael Harvey QC – Insurance and Professional Negligence Michael Spencer QC – Product Liability Christopher Purchas QC – Personal Injury Roger ter Haar QC – Commercial Dispute Resolution; Construction; Energy & Natural Resources; Insurance; International Arbitration […]

Richard Lynagh QC & James Medd successfully defend a claim under the Consumer Protection Act

News | 8th Apr 2014

Richard Lynagh QC and James Medd, instructed by Kennedys, successfully defended a claim brought against Halfords Limited under the Consumer Protection Act 1987. The Claimant had alleged that the steerer tube of a bicycle sold to him by Halfords had failed after only 9 months of normal use, causing him very serious injuries. The Claimant’s […]

Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to email this list.