Shaun is consistently recognised as a leading junior in his field. His practice is mainly in the field of personal injury and, in particular catastrophic injury cases. He is regularly instructed to appear against silks in such cases whether, at trial or in settlement meetings. His current caseload includes several cases involving traumatic brain injury, tetraplegia, paraplegia, traumatic amputations and fatal injuries. His experience in these fields enables him rapidly to grasp the issues involved in any particular claim (whether they be liability, causation or quantum issues) and devise an effective strategy for his clients.
He has expertise in dealing with fibromyalgia cases, tackling issues of dishonesty, causation and acceleration in such case, often having to deal with allegations of fraud against a background of complicated factual and medical evidence.
He is adept at working as part of team, giving advice and input in the tactical management of a case. He is a skilled and robust performer in court, whether at interlocutory hearings or trial.
Shaun deals with all aspects of personal injury work and has developed a particular expertise in catastrophic injury cases.
He has dealt with a wide range of cases involving:
- Traumatic brain injury
- Subtle brain injury (such as diffuse axonal injury)
- Tetraplegia, paraplegia and other serious spinal injury claims
- Traumatic amputation (and elective amputation cases)
- Fatal accidents
- Psychiatric injury
- Chronic pain conditions and, in particular, fibromyalgia cases
He advises and deals with issues such as:
- Periodical Payment Orders
- Provisional damages
- Pension loss claims
- Claims by infants
- Allegations of fraud, dishonesty and deliberate exaggeration (and the use of surveillance evidence)
- Assault cases arising out the use of a motor vehicle
Shaun is accustomed to dealing with complex expert evidence (on issues of liability, causation or quantum) and is able quickly to assimilate such evidence, enabling him to provide expert input into the preparation of his client’s case.
- Traumatic brain injury sustained by a 14 year old claimant in a road traffic accident where liability and quantum remain in issue.
- Traumatic brain injury sustained by a 6 month old infant in a road traffic accident where significant input into rehabilitation, education and family relations was needed.
- Traumatic brain injury suffered by a claimant who returned to live in Poland where issues relating to periodical payments, indexation, life expectancy and the provision of care and rehabilitation in Poland had to be explored – instructed alone against a silk.
- Traumatic brain injury case where, at the settlement meeting, all issues save for care were resolved, significantly reducing the issues remaining for trial – instructed alone against a silk and a junior.
- Traumatic brain injury case where injury sustained when claimant deliberately struck by defendant’s vehicle – arguments on liability as to assault and self-defence.
- Claim by a pedestrian for traumatic brain injury contested on liability involving trial and hearing in Court of Appeal – instructed alone against a silk.
- Claim by paraplegic claimant who suffered injury to her shoulder and arm when her wheelchair failed – issues involving product liability and defect, causation and analysis of the extent of the injury sustained.
- Road traffic claim involving a defence of automatism where arguments are raised that such a defence is inconsistent with EU law – instructed alone against a silk and a junior.
- Claim arising from T6 paraplegia where instructed to provide advice on behalf of claimant and defendant to achieve early resolution of the claim.
- Claim by claimant with paraplegia arguing over manual handling requirements for carers involved in transfers and over need for and cost of hydrotherapy pool.
- Claim by RAF serviceman for injuries sustained in “It’s A Knockout” type activity resulting in paraplegia – liability contested at two trials and one appeal hearing – claim eventually settled.
- Fatal accident claim arising out of collision where two defendants blamed each other – issues involving insurance coverage and MIB involvement.
- Claim involving elective below knee injury following crush injury to foot.
- Claim arising from fractures of tibia and fibula resulting in below knee amputation – issues involving clinical negligence in post accident treatment as well as liability for initial injury.
- Claim for below knee amputation where significant issues as to prosthetic provision and pre accident employment prospects arose.
- Claim for Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome and depression where surveillance demonstrated that claimant was exaggerating.
- Claim involving bilateral knee injuries requiring total knee replacement on one side and likely total knee replacement on the other side in future with issues over future employment, accommodation and care needs.
- Claim in which the claimant alleged that he had suffered a stroke following carotid artery dissection as a result of lifting heavy loads at work – significant issues as to causation involving complex medical evidence in a number of fields.
- A number of claims involving fibromyalgia where issues of fraud, dishonesty, deliberate exaggeration, causation, acceleration and prognosis are disputed.
- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome – A Judicial Review
- Withdrawing admissions – Wood v Days Healthcare UK Limited  EWCA Civ 2097
- Shaun Ferris has negotiated the settlement of a traumatic brain injury case involving a Claimant living in Poland
- Shaun Ferris has appeared in the Court of Appeal and upheld a finding in favour of a motorist who collided with a pedestrian who had run out in front of her
“An excellent negotiator who is exceptionally straightforward with his advice.”
Chambers & Partners UK Bar 2018
“Has an easy manner and is popular with clients.”
Chambers & Partners UK Bar 2018
“he is very highly regarded by insurers for his thorough approach and sound advice”; “he immediately grasps the important issues and understands the commercial realities”
Legal 500 2016
“he is very easy to deal with and very clear and incisive in his advice” ; “he’s QC material at a junior price”
Chambers & Partners 2016
“he has exceptional leadership qualities that make him very popular with clients” ; “takes a very level-headed and practical approach”
Legal 500 2015
“a robust advocate with a keen tactical appreciation of the complexities of catastrophic injury cases”; he’s practical and down-to-earth, and has an excellent rapport with clients. He makes sensible commercial decisions and is collaborative in his approach”
Chambers & Partners 2015
“adopts a relaxed but detailed approach”; “very user friendly, analytical and unflappable”
Legal 500 2014
“a market leader in large-loss claims” “He’s excellent, and takes a detailed approach”
Chambers & Partners 2014
“QC-level advocacy skills” and “good fun to work with”
Legal 500 2013
“excellent advocacy skills” ; “superb tactical appreciation”
Chambers & Partners 2012
“one of the best senior juniors in personal injury”
Legal 500 2011
“a first-class senior junior” ; “thoughtful and pragmatic” ; “ability to persuade the judge around to his way of thinking.”
Chambers & Partners 2011