Skip to content

Rory Holmes

Call 2009

"He has a first-rate mind, pays great attention to detail and produces first-rate drafting. He is in a class of his own when it comes to difficult multiparty negotiations."
(Chambers & Partners)

Personal Injury

Rory has a broad practice, and is instructed in cases involving physical injuries, psychiatric injuries, TBI/mTBI, audio-vestibular injuries, chronic pain syndromes, and functional/somatoform disorders. He has particular experience in proceedings where fraud or dishonesty is alleged or intimated.

Rory deals with the whole gamut of claims against local authorities, public providers, manufacturers, occupiers, employers and the MIB.

He has particular interest in abuse, workplace bullying, and stress at work claims, including where there is overlap with previous employment tribunal proceedings. He is currently instructed in two high value stress at work claims heading for Trial in 2024.

He also has a particular interest in injuries arising from or in connection with professional sport.  He has a strong sporting background, which is something which lends itself to an easy understanding of liability and quantum issues in that sphere.

He acts in claims arising from accidents abroad and those occurring in this jurisdiction involving foreign nationals.

Rory advises on all aspects of litigation including capacity, limitation, liability, and quantum, either at conference or in writing. His cases regularly involve the drafting of detailed schedules and counter schedules of loss. He delivers seminars on a range of topics to solicitor and insurer clients.

Rory enjoys a mixed practice, and acts for both claimants and defendants. He is instructed by major insurers on a repeat basis and also regularly carries out work for various Local Authorities. He is willing to act on a CFA in appropriate cases.

Representative examples of Rory’s recent work are as follows:

Assault

  • S v M (2024) – Acting for manufacturing company following assault on worker by colleague. Issues relating to ‘close connection’ test and D’s knowledge of employee’s propensity to violence.
  • O v NRG (2023) – Acting for retailer following serious assault on employer by customer. Issues relate to system in place to deal with aggressive third parties.
  • R v O PLC (2021) – Acting for a stocktaking/supply chain provider following an assault in the workplace. Injuries said to have necessitated early retirement. D successfully withdrew a pre-issue admission of liability at a contested hearing.
  • N v R (2020) – Acting for a commercial coach company, following a workplace assault where it was alleged that the employer was both primarily liable and vicariously liable for its employee. The defendant obtained summary judgment on all allegations of breach.
  • G v G (2017) – Acting for a claimant following an armed robbery in her workplace giving rise to PTSD, involving expert evidence from security consultants.

Brain injury

  • A v S (2024) – Acting for defendant following accident at work said to have given rise to subtle brain injury and significant audio-vestibular symptoms preventing work. Index claim follows previous brain injury claim circa 20 years earlier.
  • A v R (2024) – Acting for a Claimant who suffered a TBI and PTSD when 5 years old following a fall from height. Claimant now a young adult, who lacks capacity. High value claim given need for significant neurorehabilitation to preserve earning capacity.
  • P v CCTS (2024) – Acting for Defendant following RTA said to have given to moderate-severe TBI for geriatric claimant on background of pre-existing learning difficulties.
  • D v R (2023) – Acting for an elderly claimant who suffered a moderate/severe TBI with psychiatric overlay following RTA.
  • C v A (2022) – Acting for defendant following modest head injury where C alleged she developed mTBI, functional neurological disorder, and various audio-vestibular sequelae including a balance disorder.
  • M v CJ (2021) – EL claim where claimant suffered significant head injury leading to alleged moderate/severe TBI and serious neuropsychiatric sequelae.

Chronic pain

  • H v A (2024) – Acting for a claimant following RTA, giving rise to various chronic musculo-skeletal and neurological symptoms, PTSD, depression.
  • M v F & SR (2024) – Acting for a claimant who suffered mTBI, chronic musculo-skeletal pain and audio-vestibular injuries.
  • S v A (2023) – Acting for an insurer where claimant suffered lower limb crush injury involving multiple fractures, severe soft tissue injuries, and neuropathic pain. Claimant unable to return to pre-accident employment.
  • S v B (2021) – Acting for defendant following innocuous EL incident giving rise to alleged chronic pain, psychiatric conditions, suicidal ideation, all said to prevent return to any remunerative work.
  • P & others v P (2020) – Acting for a national care home operator providing services to vulnerable adults, where assaults by service users on staff have given rise to multiple large chronic pain claims. The claims have all been successfully brought to a conclusion at JSMs.

Discrimination

  • V v L  (2024) – Acting for a healthcare provided in respect of allegations that its policies are discriminatory.
  • C v MOJ & PG  (2024) – Acting for contractor to MOJ responsible for provision of education services in prisons.
  • Various (2022) – Acting for various pharmacies on the instructions on NPA in relation to a range of discrimination claims pertaining to Covid 19 policies.
  • Various (2022) – Acting for G4S in defence of various claims brought by prisoners in relation to alleged discriminatory policies and/or harassment and/or breach of HRA 1998.
  • B v P (2020) – Acting for a London members club in respect of a claim brought by former member who alleged expulsion due to discriminatory practices.
  • V v TTC (2019) – Acting for retailer in respect of claim brought by customer who alleged that discriminatory customer services practices gave rise to psychiatric injury.

EL/PL

  • F v TH & BC – Acting for contractor in multi party dispute following crushing accident at construction site. Dispute on vicarious liability concerning stage 1 test.
  • W v M & C & G (2022) – Acting for a principal contractor in multi-party dispute following a fall from height at development in central London.
  • L v F & B & P (2020) – Acting for a landlord following a collapsed ceiling occurring during the course of soft strip demolition works.
  • B v R & F & S (2020) – Acting for a claimant in a multi party dispute following an amputation in a construction site accident.
  • T v M (2018) & others – Acting for a national theme park operator in a host of EL/ PL claims across a range of sites.

Fatal

  • D v A (2024) – Acting for dependants following a fatal RTA with large services claim.
  • A v C & others (2023) – Acting for insurer following a fatal multi-vehicle RTA, where co-D stood in shoes of MIB as Article 75 insurer. Liability resolved at JSM. Claims ongoing.
  • B v S (2023) – Acting for insurer following fatal RTA. Claim involves complex accident reconstruction evidence. Claims ongoing.
  • P v P (2020) – Acting for dependants following a fatal RTA. Claim pleaded at £2.4M and settled at JSM.
  • L v B (2017) – Acting for a claimant in a fatal accident action where a large financial services dependency upon a teenage child was achieved in settlement. Claim compromised.

Orthopaedic/amputation

  • F v TH & BC (2024) – Acting for contractor following crushing accident at construction site giving rise to severe lower limb injuries.
  • V v A (2023) – Acting for a Claimant who suffered numerous lower limb fractures to ankles and knee, and is at risk of amputation.
  • H v A (2023) – Acting for insurer following lower limb crushing injury, giving rise to ankle fractures and neuropathic pain.
  • B v R & F & S (2020) – Acting for a claimant in a multi party dispute following an amputation in a construction site accident.
  • V v H (2021) – Acting for a claimant following a high-speed RTA giving rise to significant orthopaedic injuries to lower limbs. Father unable to care for young children. Led by Eliot Woolf KC. Claim settled at £1.6M shortly before Trial.
  • J v WJ (2020) – Acting for a regional pub/bar chain in a £3M+ amputation claim following an accident on its premises.

Psychiatric injury/bullying/stress

  • S & P v E (2024) – Acting for a British university in relation to bullying/harassment claim brought by two members of academic staff. Claims pleaded at total of circa £2M+.
  • P v B (2024) – Acting for an international bank in a stress at work claim brought by a former trading director. Claim pleaded at £7M+. Led by Patrick Blakesley KC.
  • R v H (2024) – Acting for a local authority in relation to bullying/stress at work claim bought by former school employee. Claim complicated by parallel ET proceedings.
  • S v A (2023) – Acting for a claimant who developed PTSD and functional speech disorder symptomology following a RTA.

Selected Cases

Civil/Insurance Fraud

Rory acts across a wide range of EL/PL proceedings where issues of fraud/FD/exaggeration arise on either liability and/or quantum. His case load include physical injuries, psychiatric injuries, chronic pain syndromes, functional/somatoform disorders, audio-vestibular injuries and mTBI/TBI claims.

Examples of Rory’s recent work include:

  • V v SA & JO (2022) – Acting for a residential home in an EL amputation claim where C’s account of alleged mechanism is subject to a FD /s.57 defence. Claim settled for modest global cost/damages before Trial.
  • A v D & others (2022) – Acting for construction site contractor in EL claim where C’s late account on alleged mechanism is subject to a FD/s.57 defence. Claim ongoing.
  • M v E & F (2021)  – Acting for construction site contractor in EL claim where C’s inconsistent account resulted in abandonment of case at door of Court leading to disapplication of QOCS hearings.
  • S v B (2021)  – Acting for employer following innocuous EL incident giving rise to alleged chronic pain and psychiatric conditions said to prevent return to any remunerative work. Seven figure pleaded claim resulted in low settlement following JSM.
  • R v O PLC(2021) -Acting for a stocktaking/supply chain provider following an assault in the workplace said to have brought about early retirement. D resiled from admission of liability made whilst claim was still in portal. Claim settled thereafter for low sum by way of part 36.
  • F P & others (2021)  – Acting for landlord in PL claim following fall from balcony. Alleged orthopaedic injuries said to prevent return to heavy labour. Review of physiotherapy records give rise to FD/s.57 defence. Claim settled for modest global cost/damages following mediation.

Selected Cases

View full profile »

Awards


  • Erasmus Scholar (2005)
  • St John’s College Cambridge, McMahon Post-graduate law scholarship (2007, 2008)
  • Middle Temple Lord Diplock Scholar (2008)
  • Pegasus Scholar (Singapore) (2013)

News


Read more

Articles


Read more

Qualifications


  • Modern and Medieval Languages BA (Hons) (Cantab) (2003-2007)
  • La Universidad de Complutense, Madrid (2004-2005)
  • GDL (City University) (2007-2008)
  • BVC (City University) (2008-2009)
  • BVC-LLM (City University) (2010)
  • MA (Cantab) (2010)

Before coming to the Bar, Rory read Modern and Medieval Languages at St. John’s College, Cambridge, and at La Universidad de Complutense, Madrid.

In 2013 Rory was seconded to the commercial department of Rajah & Tann, Singapore, as a Pegasus Scholar.

Languages

Spanish and French.

Memberships


  • PIBA

Recommendations


“Rory is very forensic in his approach and his attention to detail is excellent. He knows the cases inside out and can identify the key issues in a case.”… “He is excellent in court and quick at turning things around.”

Chambers & Partners, 2024

“Rory is always calm, collected and highly effective. He is a brilliant advocate and a joy to watch when on his feet.”

Legal 500, 2024

“Rory is a pleasure to deal with. He is excellent with clients and he always goes the extra mile.”

Chambers & Partners, 2023

“Rory is always up for the challenge of taking on technically complex procedural arguments.”

Chambers & Partners, 2023

“Rory is very capable and exceptional on his feet.”

Chambers & Partners, 2023

“Rory is unflappable and provides clear and concise advice at all times.”

Legal 500, 2023

“A soft-spoken but robust advocate, who is very good at drawing out technical legal points from complex cases and is very reliable too.”

Chambers & Partners, 2022

“He has a first-rate mind, pays great attention to detail and produces first-rate drafting. He is in a class of his own when it comes to difficult multiparty negotiations.”

Chambers & Partners, 2022


Portfolio Builder

Close

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download Add to portfolio
Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download