Insurance & Reinsurance
Isabel has acted in a wide range of insurance disputes for both insurers and insured. Matters have included:
- Fraud, arson and non-disclosure.
- Construction of the policy and scope of cover, including business interruption.
- Disputes as to timing, both as to the inception of cover and the occurrence of the insured event.
- Valuation of claims.
Many of Isabel’s instructions in construction and property damage cases are on behalf of insurers.
- Isabel currently acts, leading a team of juniors, for a major insurer on its entire book of claims arising out of alleged failures in the installation of cavity wall insulation by installers.
- She has also been instructed in test cases against Network Rail both in relation to liability and scope of recoverable damages following line incursions and property damage: including Network Rail v Handy et al  EWHC 1175 (TCC) and Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v House of Goodness Ltd.
In addition Isabel has a niche specialism in motor insurance.
She is instructed by the Attorney General on a portfolio of cases following the CJEU decision in Vnuk where claimants are seeking Francovich damages against the Secretary of State for Transport for alleged failure correctly to implement EU Directives on motor insurance resulting in compulsory motor insurance being of incompatible scope and where MIB has issued contribution claims against Secretary of State for Transport following findings that it is liable to meet claimants’ claims in direct effect: issued claims include Richards, Lewis, Olver, Telling-Evans and Tierney. Outcome of MIB’s application to Supreme Court for permission to appeal in Lewis awaited.
Isabel successfully defeated a multi-million pound claim against motor insurers by a passenger abandoned by a criminal taxi driver Carroll v (1) Michael Taylor (2) Michael Doyle (3) Emms Taxis Limited (4) QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited  EWHC 153 (QB). This instruction followed her successful defence of motor insurers (led by Andrew Bartlett QC and instructed by the same solicitors) in the claims by victims of the ‘black cab’ serial sex offender AXN v Worboys  EWHC 1730 (QB) |  6 WLUK 554 |  Lloyd’s Rep. I.R. 207 |  L.L.R. 256.
- Neil Carroll -v- (1) Michael Taylor (2) Michael Doyle (3) Emms Taxi Limited (4) QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited  EWHC 153 (QB).
- AXN v Worboys  EWHC 1730 (QB) |  6 WLUK 554 |  Lloyd’s Rep. I.R. 207 |  L.L.R. 256
- Lewis v Tindale and MIB and Secretary of State for Transport (ongoing, MIB’s application for permission to appeal to Supreme Court pending). Court of Appeal  EWCA Civ 909; first instance  EWHC 2376 (QB).
- Isabel Hitching QC will be speaking at the Society of Construction Law’s lecture, “The Hudson-formula: death by footnote?” – Tuesday 7 September 2021
- Compulsory ADR – a new tool in the court’s box?
- Covid-19 and the Construction Industry: Emden Editor’s Letter 26 May 2020 by Isabel Hitching QC
- Carroll v Taylor – Court of Appeal rejects appeal ‘bound to fail’
- Crown Office Chambers ranked in Chambers Global 2021 for Construction
- MA (First Class), Christ Church, Oxford
- BCL, Christ Church, Oxford
- Open Scholar, Open Exhibitioner, Radcliffe Exhibitioner and Dixon Scholar Christ Church, Oxford
- Lord Justice Sachs Scholarship, Middle Temple
- Queen Mother Scholarship, Middle Temple
- Inns of Court Studentship
- Previously non-stipendiary lecturer in law Christ Church Oxford
- Member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee
- Member of Bar Council International Committee with special focus on South East Asia
- Professional Negligence Bar Association
- Commercial Bar Association
- London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association
- Society of Construction Law (and past committee member)
- Technology & Construction Bar Association (and past committee member)
- Joint editor of Emden’s Construction Law
- Former member of Attorney General’s Treasury Panel. Continues to act for government as silk.
- Past member of Bar Standards Board Equality & Diversity Committee
- Past member and vice-chair of Bar Standards Board Qualifications Committee
“Very sensitive to the needs of the client, and adopts a realistic and commercial view in order to achieve the best result.”
(Legal 500, 2021)
“A standout barrister at the construction Bar.”
(Legal 500, 2021)
“She is clear and concise as an advocate, with the ability to see the bigger picture in disputes.”
(Chambers & Partners, 2021)
“She has a chess grand master’s great grasp of strategy.”
(Chambers & Partners, 2020)
“She has an awesome intellect and always examines issues from all angles.”
“A superb tactician, who is masterly with the game plan.”
“An extremely competent tactician who provides very strong strategy.”
“A specialist in construction, with regular High Court appearances.”
“A highly intelligent and practical barrister.”
(Chambers & Partners)