Skip to content

Dermot Woolgar

Call 1988

"A highly personable barrister with superb technical and tactical skills."
(Solicitor 2011)

Professional Liability

Dermot regularly acts in a wide range of professional negligence claims. Because of his long experience in commercial, chancery and property-related disputes, his cases predominantly concern claims in these and related fields. He advises in connection with and conducts claims concerning solicitors, barristers and licensed conveyancers; surveyors, valuers, planning consultants and architects; financial advisers, accountants, and other finance professionals; brokers and other insurance professionals.

Selected Cases

  • Acting for claimant in substantial claim against solicitors for ineffective drafting of break notice, which left claimant with unwanted lease of large office premises.
  • Acting for freehold proprietors and their insurers of substantial part residential and part commercial / retail building in action against construction company and building design company under Defective Premises Act 1972 and in negligence concerning defective design and construction of primary and secondary supports for mechanical, electrical and public health installations and fire stopping system that caused fracturing of soil vent pipes and substantial flooding; additional claim against architects under Defective Premises Act and in negligence for failing to reject design.
  • Acting for proprietors of newly-constructed townhouse against construction company under Defective Premises Act for failures concerning capping off of drainage pipe which permitted entry of waste into the property on the failure of a pumped waste collection system.
  • Acting for property developers in claim against solicitors and architects / planning consultants arising from allegedly negligent conduct of purchase of, and subsequent residential redevelopment of, former commercial site.
  • Acting for company in successfully mediated claim against firm of surveyors appointed by insurers for negligent insurance valuation concerning commercial premises subsequently damaged by fire.
  • Acting for London hotel proprietors in claim against solicitors for negligent advice in connection with the purchase of a hotel.
  • Advising mortgagees in connection with claim against surveyors for allegedly negligent overvaluation of residential property.
  • Advising landlord in connection with claim against former managing agents for failing to warn of disrepair.
  • Advising Dutch company on merits of claim against liquidators for misfeasance.
  • Claim against trading standards department of local authority for allegedly negligent advice concerning regulations governing operation of an unlicensed slaughterhouse.
  • Claim against insurance brokers concerning advice given in connection with completion of proposal for critical illness insurance.
  • Claim against solicitors concerning failure to warn purchaser of agricultural and development property about public rights of way.
  • Claim against solicitors concerning allegedly negligent disposal of share portfolio.
  • Defending solicitor-executor in claim by beneficiary of valuable estate under Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act; solicitor-executor alleged to be personally liable for consequences of premature distribution of substantial part of estate and for failing to adopt a neutral stance; related claims for alleged negligence concerning failure to give advice about deed of variation to minimise exposure to IHT.
  • Page v Champion Financial Management Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 1778 (QB) – Acting for claimant against various companies within an IFA group in respect of allegedly defective advice concerning tax avoidance film partnership and music recording artist partnership schemes. Complaints included inadequate steps to establish the client’s objectives and his attitude to investment risk; whether or not misrepresentations had been made to the client about the extent to which the schemes had HMRC approval; whether or not there had been manipulation of forms after they had been completed by the claimant; and as to the extent of liability under s39 of FSMA. Case is reported on a procedural issue – whether a default judgment against one defendant is binding on another defendant in the same action.
View full profile »


Read more


  • Diploma in International Commercial Arbitration, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
  • LLB (Hons), Manchester University


  • Administrative Law Bar Association
  • Commercial Bar Association
  • London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association
  • London Court of International Arbitration
  • Professional Negligence Bar Association

Portfolio Builder


Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download Add to portfolio
Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to email this list.