Construction & Engineering
Recommended in Legal 500, Chambers UK, Chambers Global and Who’s Who Legal
Crispin’s experience ranges from residential building disputes to major international projects. He has been instructed in cases concerning residential extensions and conversions, houses, hotels, hospitals, apartment blocks, schools, housing estates, shopping malls, leisure centres, factories, power stations, process plants, water treatment works, roads, railways, airports, tunnels, micro-tunnels, pipelines and Oil and Gas installations (both onshore and offshore). He has dealt with many of the standard forms (e.g. JCT, ICE, NEC, FIDIC, IChemE) and a range of bespoke contracts. He is one of the authors of Emden’s Construction Law.
Crispin is a TECBAR accredited adjudicator, acts for and advises adjudicating parties and appears in the TCC on enforcement proceedings. Reported adjudication cases include:
- WRW Construction v Datblygau Davies Developments  EWHC 1965 (TCC).
- Dawnus Construction Holdings v Marsh Life  EWHC 1066 (TCC); 172 Con LR 162;  CILL 3977.
- South Coast Construction v Iverson Road  EWHC 61 (TCC);  1 All ER (Comm) 653;  BLR 169.
- Imtech Inviron v Loppingdale Plant  EWHC 4006 (TCC);  CILL 3613;  BLR 183.
- Ellis Building Contractors v Goldstein  EWHC 269 (TCC);  CILL 3049.
- OSC Building Services v Interior Dimensions Contracts  EWHC 248 (TCC);  CILL 2688.
- Allen Wilson Joinery v Privetgrange Construction  EWHC 2802 (TCC);  TCLR 1; 123 Con LR 1.
- Acting for the employer in a €10m ICC arbitration relating to the disputed termination of a contract for the construction of a medical facility in Malta. FIDIC Yellow Book. Maltese seat and Maltese law. 5 day evidential hearing.
- Acting for the employer in a $100m ad hoc international arbitration concerning the construction of an 8-lane expressway. FIDIC Red Book. Middle Eastern seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state. 13 day evidential hearing.
- Eco World – Ballymore Embassy Gardens v Dobler UK  EWHC 2207 (TCC);  TCLR 7; 197 Con LR 108 – representing the employer in a case about the enforceability of LADs where the employer had taken partial possession of the works but the contract contained no mechanism for reducing the level of LADs.
- Doosan Enpure v Interserve Construction  EWHC 2497 (TCC);  BLR 630 – acting for a contractor in a £5m dispute with its JV partner concerning the release of interim payments in respect of an upgrade to a water treatment works under an NEC3 Option C target cost contract.
- Acting for a contractor in a $400m LCIA arbitration relating to an oil and gas project in the Middle East. Bespoke contract. London seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state. 2 week evidential hearing. Issues included contractual interpretation, process engineering, delay analysis and quantum.
- Acting for a Middle Eastern government in a $500m ICC arbitration relating to the construction of an international airport. FIDIC Red Book. Middle Eastern seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state. 13 day evidential hearing. Issues included analysis and quantification of claims for extensions of time, prolongation and disruption costs.
- Acting for a state-owned oil company in a $multi-billion LCIA arbitration arising from an oil and gas project in the Middle East. Bespoke contract. London seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state. 2 week evidential hearing. Issues included contractual interpretation, engineering practice in the oil and gas industry and quantity surveying practice.
- Acting for a Middle Eastern government in a $750m ICC arbitration relating to the construction of an international airport. FIDIC Yellow Book. Middle Eastern seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state. 65 days of evidential hearings. Multiple claims involving complex issues relating to design obligations, architecture, structural and seismic engineering, fire safety engineering, mechanical and electrical engineering, forensic delay analysis and quantum.
- Acting for a police authority in a £multi-million dispute concerning the construction of a new custody facility. Issues included design obligations, energy efficiency, mechanical and electrical engineering, loss and expense.
- Triuva Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft v Galliford Try v Alumet  EWHC 275 (TCC) – acting for a contractor in a £3m claim arising out of alleged defects in glazing, curtain walling and cladding works to a ten-storey office building in Birmingham.
- Gray v Elite Town Management  EWCA Civ 1318 – acting in a party wall dispute arising out of adjoining basement constructions in central London. Appeared as sole counsel in two week-long trials and in the Court of Appeal.
- Acting for the developer of a £250m project in central London in TCC proceedings involving multiple applications for injunctive relief and complex issues of law and geotechnical and structural engineering.
- Acting for a joint venture contractor in a £multi-million PFI dispute in the TCC and a related adjudication.
- Rohan & Ors v Daman Real Estate Capital Partners  DIFC CA 005 and CA 006 – acting for purchasers in the DIFC (Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal) in a claim for AED 12m arising out of delay to a mixed-use development in Dubai.
- Acting for consulting engineers in a $12m DIAC arbitration. Dubai seat and UAE substantive law. 4 day evidential hearing. Issues related to mechanical and electrical engineering and quantum.
- Inframatrix v Dean Construction  EWCA Civ 64; 140 Con LR 59;  28 Const LJ 438;  CILL 3145 – representing a developer in the TCC and in the Court of Appeal in relation to a £2m claim for defects in the construction of a specialist camera factory.
- Acting for a state-owned oil company in a £100m LCIA arbitration concerning an oil and gas project in the Middle East. Bespoke contract. London seat and substantive law of the Middle Eastern state.
- Acting for a Danish contractor in DAB proceedings relating to a power plant in the Caribbean. London seat and English substantive law. Appeared as counsel at DAB hearing.
- Harrison & ors v Shepherd Homes  EWHC 1811 (TCC); 27 Const LJ 709 – acting for the residents of a housing estate in a 5-week TCC trial successfully recovering damages for losses resulting from defective piled foundations.
- Acting for a developer in a $130m international arbitration concerning a hotel and condominium project in the Caribbean which suffered hurricane damage during the course of construction. London seat and substantive law of the Caribbean Island. 2 month evidential hearing.
- Acting for the Anglo-Japanese-Irish consortium that built the Dublin Port Tunnel in relation to claims before a DAB for delay, disruption, loss and expense totalling about 300m Euros. ICE 7th edition. Irish seat and Irish substantive law. Multiple DAB hearings. Issues included ground conditions (involving geotechnical engineering), design strength, the design approvals procedure and the analysis and quantification of delay, disruption, loss and expense.
- Crown Office Chambers features in The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of this year
- Roger ter Haar QC, Andrew Rigney QC and Crispin Winser QC ranked in the Legal 500 EMEA 2021 Edition
- An Exercise in Utility: Liquidators Adjudicating Construction Disputes
- “When Insolvency Trumps Rough Justice: Injunctions and Stays of Execution of Adjudication Proceedings”, The Society of Construction Law
- Registered practitioner in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC)
- Major Scholar, Inner Temple
- MSc Construction Law & Dispute Resolution, King’s College London
- Dip Law, City University
- BA, Bristol University
- British Japanese Law Association
- Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb)
- Commercial Bar Association
- LCIA European Users Council
- London Common Law and Commercial Bar Association
- Society of Construction Law (UK & Gulf)
- Technology & Construction Bar Association
- Legal 500 2022 London Bar: recommended 2021 silk for Construction, Energy and International Arbitration
- Legal 500 2022 UAE: recommended 2021 silk for Construction
- Chambers UK 2022: recommended new silk for Construction and International Arbitration: Construction/Engineering
- Chambers Global 2022: recommended new silk for Construction
- Who’s Who Legal 2022: national leader and future leader for Construction
“He is a good sounding board for strategies and excellent on his feet where he is very calm and assured.” … “A very clinical and really compelling advocate.” … “His strengths lie in quickly grasping the matter of the dispute and delivering fast, reliable advice.”
Chambers & Partners, 2022
“Crispin is frighteningly bright. He has a forensic mind which allows him to see through the chaff and get to the nub of any issue quickly. His advocacy style is calm, measured but insistent. Very effective.” … “Simply superb. Very responsive, helpful and suitably aggressive when he needs to be. A dedicated expert in his field. Richly deserved elevation to silk.” … “An excellent and polished advocate who works exceptionally hard to master the papers and be fully on top of the brief.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Reasonable, on top of the detail, commercial and an amazing advocate – particularly at cross-examination.”
Legal 500 EMEA, 2021
“a highly recommended dispute resolution practitioner who excels at assisting construction and energy sector clients in complex proceedings”
Who's Who Legal 2021
“One of the standout performers among senior juniors at the Construction Bar. He is thorough, well prepared, and an effective advocate.” … “He’s considered, calm under pressure and able to get up to speed quickly.”
Chambers & Partners, 2021
“Hard-working, team player who really understands how to present in international arbitration – should be a QC already.” … “Hard-working, great team player. Excellent cross-examination skills. Best junior barrister I have come across.” … “An excellent senior-junior – very clever and responsive.”
Legal 500, 2021
“absolutely first rate … an excellent cross-examiner in an arbitration context”
Who's Who Legal, 2020
“An excellent senior-junior – very clever and responsive.”
Legal 500 2020, EMEA
“highly responsive … creative and quick on his feet, with real substance on the intellectual side of a dispute” … “He is stunningly good. His work is detailed and his manner of cross-examination is incisive but pleasant.” … “He prepares thoroughly and is very perceptive and good on his feet”
Chambers & Partners, 2020
“Very proactive and impressive.” … “Extremely hardworking, very effective in cross-examination and always responsive.”
Legal 500, 2020
“Excellent and technically very able. He is very personable and not afraid to roll up his sleeves and work as part of a wider legal team.”
Chambers & Partners, 2019