Carlo has been recommended as a Leading Individual in the Legal 500 in this area since 2017 and is frequently instructed in professional negligence claims involving the full spectrum of professionals, including lawyers, liquidators, accountants, architects / engineers / design consultants, valuers and brokers. He is regularly instructed on his own or as a leading junior against QCs, and likewise as a part of a larger counsel team.
He has recently conducted a (resoundingly successful) adjudication under the pilot professional negligence adjudication scheme.
Carlo is also a PNBA accredited adjudicator.
- Ingenious Litigation – Carlo is instructed, with Ben Quiney QC, and Frederick Simpson for one of the lead Defendants in the Ingenious Litigation. The litigation concerns the alleged fraudulent and negligent mis-selling of investments in a series of film and game finance schemes. The Claimants total over 500 and bring claims for in excess of £100m. The case was named as one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases of 2018. Carlo and Ben have recently been successful in applying for security for costs from a commercial litigation funder funding a number of the Claimants’ claims.
- Architect’s dispute with Oxbridge College – Together with Ben Quiney QC, Carlo successfully defended an architect’s practice in a £9M adjudication brought by an Oxbridge College in relation to the renovation of one of its main listed courts.
- Saunders & Craig v Hunt – Carlo is instructed as sole counsel (against a QC and senior junior) for a liquidator, Stephen Hunt, to defend a section 212 application brought against him by the successful opposing parties from previous litigation.
- Loss adjuster’s negligence – Carlo is instructed as sole counsel by a leading loss adjuster who is accused of having negligently caused insurers loss in the region of £5m in the course of adjusting a complex loss arising out of a hurricane.
- Kinde & Knight v Dellapina & Diaz – Instructed for a Spanish lawyer said to have negligently advised on and conducted an arbitration in the US, in a claim in the English Courts pleaded at $26 million. In addition to the more usual issues concerning scope and breach of duty, and causation of damage, the case raises questions involving the illegality and public policy defence, recently re-cast by the Supreme Court in Patel v Mirza  UKSC 42.
- Harris & Trotter v Bazargan – Instructed, with Ben Quiney QC, for accountants who (when suing for their fees) have been met with an allegedly significant claim for damages relating to a series of HMRC enquiries / COP9 / fraud investigations which they managed for their clients.
- A v B – instructed for a broker against a leading law firm in a matter recently settled on confidential terms. The brokers had designed a new insurance product, the structure of which had been the subject of negligent advice from the law firm in question.
- Birdi & Senna v McAndrew – allegedly valuable claim against a valuer and auctioneer by two parties, one of whom was bankrupt and one of whom was alleged to have some interest in property apparently forming part of the other’s bankruptcy estate. Carlo succeeded in having the claim by both claimants against his client struck out by Newey J at the conclusion of pleadings (it continues between one of the claimants and another defendant).
- Jones v Kaney  UKSC 13;  2 WLR 823 – During pupillage, Carlo assisted Roger ter Haar QC and Daniel Shapiro in the preparation and research for the landmark appeal to the Supreme Court.
- Substituting parties after limitation period ends: AIG Europe Ltd v McCormick Roofing Ltd and another
- Ben Quiney QC, Carlo Taczalski and Frederick Simpson discuss the recent Judgment on the Ingenious Litigation for Practical Law Company
- Carlo Taczalski successfully defends Arbitration Appeal
- Success in the Commercial Court: Reflective Loss and Joinder
- Queen Mother Scholarship, Middle Temple (2010)
- Harmsworth Entrance Exhibition, Middle Temple (2010)
- Lovells Examination Prize, Downing College (2006)
- PricewaterhouseCoopers Scholarship (2005 – 2007)