Carlo has been recommended as a Leading Individual in the Legal 500 in this area since 2017 and is frequently instructed in professional negligence claims involving the full spectrum of professionals, including lawyers, liquidators, accountants, architects / engineers / design consultants, valuers and brokers. He is regularly instructed on his own or as a leading junior against QCs, and likewise as a part of a larger counsel team.
He has recently conducted a (resoundingly successful) adjudication under the pilot professional negligence adjudication scheme.
Carlo is also a PNBA accredited adjudicator.
- Ingenious Litigation – Carlo is instructed, with Ben Quiney QC, and Frederick Simpson for one of the lead Defendants in the Ingenious Litigation. The litigation concerns the alleged fraudulent and negligent mis-selling of investments in a series of film and game finance schemes. The Claimants total over 500 and bring claims for in excess of £100m. The case was named as one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases of 2018. Carlo and Ben have recently been successful in applying for security for costs from a commercial litigation funder funding a number of the Claimants’ claims.
- Broker’s negligence – Sole counsel for the claimant insurance company in a broker’s negligence claim arising out of the fraudulent ‘placement’ of a (non-existent) reinsurance policy by a sub-broker. Damages are in the region of £15M. Currently pre-action.
- Broker’s negligence – Sole counsel defending a broker in relation to allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in the context of amending policy documents without the insured’s consent, and allegedly falsifying documents to induce a renewal.
- Saunders & Craig v Hunt – Carlo is instructed as sole counsel (against a QC and senior junior) for a liquidator, Stephen Hunt, to defend a section 212 application brought against him by the successful opposing parties from previous litigation.
- Surveyor’s negligence – leading Matthew Turner in a claim against a surveyor who failed to identify relevant asbestos in a full pre-purchase survey of a substantial property causing significant loss (pre-action).
- Architect’s dispute with Oxbridge College – Together with Ben Quiney QC, Carlo successfully defended an architect’s practice in a £9M adjudication brought by an Oxbridge College in relation to the renovation of one of its main listed courts.
- Loss adjuster’s negligence – Carlo is instructed as sole counsel by a leading loss adjuster who is accused of having negligently caused insurers loss in the region of £5m in the course of adjusting a complex loss arising out of a hurricane.
- Kinde & Knight v Dellapina & Diaz – Instructed for a Spanish lawyer said to have negligently advised on and conducted an arbitration in the US, in a claim in the English Courts pleaded at $26 million. In addition to the more usual issues concerning scope and breach of duty, and causation of damage, the case raises questions involving the illegality and public policy defence, recently re-cast by the Supreme Court in Patel v Mirza  UKSC 42.
- Harris & Trotter v Bazargan – Instructed, with Ben Quiney QC, for accountants who (when suing for their fees) have been met with an allegedly significant claim for damages relating to a series of HMRC enquiries / COP9 / fraud investigations which they managed for their clients.
- A v B – instructed for a broker against a leading law firm in a matter recently settled on confidential terms. The brokers had designed a new insurance product, the structure of which had been the subject of negligent advice from the law firm in question.
- Birdi & Senna v McAndrew – allegedly valuable claim against a valuer and auctioneer by two parties, one of whom was bankrupt and one of whom was alleged to have some interest in property apparently forming part of the other’s bankruptcy estate. Carlo succeeded in having the claim by both claimants against his client struck out by Newey J at the conclusion of pleadings (it continues between one of the claimants and another defendant).
- Jones v Kaney  UKSC 13;  2 WLR 823 – During pupillage, Carlo assisted Roger ter Haar QC and Daniel Shapiro in the preparation and research for the landmark appeal to the Supreme Court.
- Carlo Taczalski will be speaking at “Cash Is King – Payments and Changes in Tax Laws” webinar by Decipher Group
- Carlo Taczalski and Frederick Simpson are successful in the Court of Appeal Cross-undertakings have little place in the security for costs regime – Case note
- Substituting parties after limitation period ends: AIG Europe Ltd v McCormick Roofing Ltd and another
- Carlo Taczalski and Frederick Simpson are successful in the Court of Appeal as it holds that cross-undertakings have little place in the security for costs regime
- Carlo Taczalski successfully defends Arbitration Appeal
- Queen Mother Scholarship, Middle Temple (2010)
- Harmsworth Entrance Exhibition, Middle Temple (2010)
- Lovells Examination Prize, Downing College (2006)
- PricewaterhouseCoopers Scholarship (2005 – 2007)
“A great blend of being exceptionally bright, hardworking and responsive together with a charming personality. Engenders confidence of clients both in conference and courtroom. More than a match for experienced counsel both in mainstream professional indemnity work and more specialist.”
Legal 500, 2021
“Carlo is incredibly forensic in his approach to work, he deals with large quantities of information in a methodical manner and is an excellent communicator.”
Legal 500, 2021
“Handles a diverse range of construction disputes.”
Legal 500, 2020
“He is very bright and thorough when it comes to considering all the possible issues.”
Legal 500, 2020