Skip to content

Benedict Morillo

Call 2021

Benedict Morillo is developing a strong insurance, professional liability, construction, property damage, and commercial practice.

He is currently instructed (led by Daniel Shapiro KC and James Sharpe) in MW High Tech Projects Limited v Greenhalgh & Ors, a £300m TCC claim for breach of directors’ duties arising out of the Claimant’s entry into three large waste-to-energy plant projects.

Recent highlights of Benedict’s unled work include appearing for the successful Claimant in a High Court (TCC) adjudication enforcement worth over £130,000, successfully obtaining discontinuance of a £50,000 claim against an RICS surveyor for a failure to detect sulphate attack to a property, and advising in relation to the alleged failure of a solicitors’ firm to competently negotiate an option said to be worth £800,000 in a commercial lease.

Benedict maintains a regular court presence through his personal injury work. He is an experienced trial advocate and has appeared in excess of 100 final hearings since the start of his second six in April 2022.

Prior to joining Chambers, Benedict was a lecturer in Law at Oriel College, Oxford. He gave weekly tutorials in Trusts and led seminars in Contract and Tort. Before that, he took a Double First-Class undergraduate degree in Law at Oxford (coming 9th in his year). He continued at Oxford to study for the Bachelor of Civil Law, which he obtained with Distinction while achieving a First-Class mark in every paper. He was also awarded a Distinction on the Bar Course.

Benedict prides himself on his ability to bring his academic background to bear on complex legal problems while still maintaining an eminently practical and commercial approach to litigation. He particularly welcomes instructions in cases where complex points of equity and trusts intersect with the common law, as his academic background makes him well positioned to assist. In the criminal regulatory context, he has recently advised (led by Mark Balysz KC) on which of the entities within the complex group structure of a private school consisting of an unincorporated charitable trust with corporate trustees was the proper subject of a health and safety prosecution.

Alongside Douglas James, Benedict edits the Adjudication Society’s newsletter.

Professional Liability

Seats with Richard Sage and Carlo Taczalski during pupillage allowed Benedict to familiarise himself with a wide range of professional liability work. He has experience in dealing with professional liability matters involving solicitors, brokers, company directors, consultants, and construction professionals.

Examples of Benedict’s work include:

  • Solicitors – advising on quantum and settlement strategy in a matter in which solicitors had allegedly failed to competently negotiate an £800,000 option to purchase in a commercial Quantum advice involved assessing competing valuations of the option with reference to the underlying value of the site, its development potential, as well as a £200,000 figure floated during unsuccessful negotiations between the landlord and tenant for the release of the option.
  • Surveyors – advising and drafting a Defence on behalf of a surveyor who allegedly failed to identify signs of sulphate attack to a property during a RICS homebuyer’s survey. Benedict also produced an application for summary judgment on limitation grounds and successfully obtained discontinuance at an early stage in the litigation.
  • Solicitors – advising and drafting a Defence in a claim against solicitors for their alleged failure to conduct easement litigation competently. Involved complex issues of land law given that there was difficulty tracing the easement through a series of conveyances dating back to the 19th century.
  • Solicitors – advising in several White v Jones claims brought by disappointed prospective beneficiaries.
  • Solicitors – advising and drafting pre-action correspondence on behalf of the defendant conveyancing solicitors in a claim for an allegedly negligent failure to advise on the possibility of reclaiming higher rate SDLT.
  • Employment consultants – advising and drafting pre-action correspondence for a claim in which the newly hired Claimant alleged that employment consultants negligently failed to pass on his desired terms of employment to the new employer.
  • Insurance brokers – (during pupillage) drafted a Defence on behalf of an insurance broker specialising in luxury yacht insurance in an additional claim brought by an insurer for the broker’s failure to ask sufficient questions to elicit the insured’s claims history.
  • Solicitors – (during pupillage) drafted a Defence on behalf of a solicitor’s firm which allegedly breached the no-conflict duty by advising its client on an agreement entered into between the directors of the firm and the client under which the directors would raise capital for the client in exchange for an allocation of shares.
  • Surveyors – (during pupillage) drafted a Defence on behalf of the Defendant Party Wall Act surveyor who faced allegations of negligence for failing to order an intrusive structural survey into the Claimant’s property before approving work pursuant to the Act.
  • Planning consultants – (during pupillage) drafted pre-action correspondence on behalf of the Claimant in a claim concerning negligent advice on the scope of the permitted development regime for agricultural conversions. The Claimant’s newly built shed conversions had to be demolished pursuant to an enforcement notice.

Construction & Engineering

Benedict was exposed to a variety of construction disputes during pupillage while sitting with Carlo Taczalski and Richard Sage. He has experience of adjudication, arbitration, party wall act disputes and he has dealt with everything from domestic renovation projects with informal contracts to large commercial projects on JCT standard terms.

His recent work includes:

  • Bespoke measurement contract – drafted a Defence on behalf of a drylining subcontractor facing a claim in excess of £120,000 for restitution of sums paid by the main contractor pursuant to an adjudication on the basis that these sums were in respect of work which had been measured incorrectly, and that the formalities for instructing additional work had not been properly followed.
  • Domestic construction – drafted a Defence and counterclaim on behalf of a main contractor facing a claim for unpaid invoices for additional work by a sub-contractor who had negligently installed a basement waterproof membrane.
  • Adjudication enforcement – appeared as sole counsel on behalf of the successful Claimant to enforce an adjudication award of over £130,000 in the TCC. A winding-up order had been made against the Defendant between the adjudication decision’s issuance and the enforcement hearing so Benedict also had to obtain leave to proceed under s. 130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986.
  • Domestic construction – drafted Particulars of Claim and a Reply and Defence to Counterclaim on behalf of a homeowner whose home was ruined by a cowboy builder following a botched renovation. Involved issues of defective works, delay, the valuation of additional works, and habitability under the Defective Premises Act 1972.
  • Domestic construction – (during pupillage) assisted Richard Sage in Caudle Developments Limited v Warren, a three-day Central London CC TCC trial involving a dispute over which party was responsible for obtaining the regulatory approval for moving hibernating bats, and competing claims that the opposing party was in repudiatory breach of contract. Widely reported in the media and available at
  • Party Wall Act disputes – (during pupillage) drafted a Defence on behalf of Party Wall Act surveyor who faced allegations of negligence for failing to order an intrusive structural survey into the Claimant’s property before approving work pursuant to the Act.
  • Arbitration – assisting Carlo Taczalski with a multi-million pound arbitration which concerned delay on civil engineering works at a powerplant under a bespoke contract.

Property Damage

Benedict has experience in a wide range of property damage matters arising out of fire, flood, road traffic accidents and other incidents. Much of his advisory work involves subrogated recovery claims.

Recent work includes:

  • Escape of water – drafting a Defence on behalf of a plumber who had allegedly failed to properly insulate a copper pipe which burst and caused £50,000 worth of water damage to a primary school.
  • Fire – Advising on the application of Berni Inns to a lease in a subrogated claim following a fire at a quasi-charitable social housing property which had been started by a third party.
  • Flood – (during pupillage) assisted Ben Quiney KC and Alex Macpherson in a claim arising out of a flood at a luxury London property development. Issues included the availability of a co-insured defence to a sub-contractor where the main contractor had taken out all-risks project insurance.
  • Fire – (during pupillage) advising on a prospective subrogated claim concerning a defective switchboard component which caused a fire at a domestic property. A claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 was time-barred and the advice concerned which parties to pursue out of the component’s manufacturer, retailer, installing electrician, and maintaining electrician.
  • Vermin – (during pupillage) drafted a Defence on behalf of a self-storage company in a claim involving a vermin infestation which led to the Claimant’s stored property being damaged and contaminated with droppings.
  • Fire – (during pupillage) advising on the merits of a prospective subrogated claim where an insured’s leisure centre was heavily damaged by fire seemingly caused by a sub-contractor during hot roofing work.
  • Fire – (during pupillage) advising an insurer on quantum in a claim brought by an insured for an indemnity after its private psychiatric ward burnt down. Involved issues of compensating advantages/collateral benefits and betterment, as the ward the insured proposed to reinstate would have been more profitable than the destroyed ward.


A seat with Carlo Taczalski during pupillage exposed Benedict to a range of general commercial work involving—among other things—agency, civil fraud, and sale of goods contracts. His academic background gives him particular familiarity with commercial law. He studied Commercial Remedies and Restitution of Unjust Enrichment on the BCL (the latter of which he was taught by Lord Burrows of the Supreme Court), and as a Trusts tutor at Oxford he had a particular interest in remedies for breaches of fiduciary duties.

His work includes:

  • Drafting a Defence, an Additional Claim, and advising in a contractual dispute between a recruitment agency and a construction company. The recruitment agency had purportedly assigned its rights to payment under the contract to an factoring company, who brought the main claim for unpaid invoices against the construction company. The construction company sought a refund for commission fees it had paid to the recruitment agency. Issues concerned assignment, contractual interpretation, and incorporation of terms.
  • Drafting a Defence on behalf of a life coach in a dispute concerning the terms of a contract to provide life coaching. Issues included the interaction of certainty of terms and the implication of terms under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
  • (During pupillage) assisted Carlo Taczalski in a PD 51U disclosure guidance hearing. Researched the scope and nature of an agent’s duty to disclose documents to the principal following termination of the agency.
  • (During pupillage) assisted Carlo Taczalski in a claim brought by an insured against its broker for fraudulently representing that the insurer had agreed to an indemnity which involved the falsification of various documents. Issues concerned the broker’s vicarious liability for a rogue employee and attribution of the rogue employee’s dishonesty to the brokering firm.
  • (During pupillage) assisted Jason Evans-Tovey with an interim application for an injunction to prevent a business’ bank accounts from being closed by its bank.
  • (During pupillage) drafting a Particulars of Claim and Reply and Defence to Counterclaim in a case involving a packaging and logistics company’s claim for the value of reusable storage containers which the Defendant client had hired and seemingly lost.
  • (During pupillage) drafted a Defence in a claim involving the Defendant adhesive manufacturer’s supply of an allegedly defective adhesive. Involved complex scientific expert evidence regarding the chemical makeup and material properties of the adhesive.

Insurance & Reinsurance

Most of Benedict’s work involves an insurance element. Benedict has experience in advising in a range of ‘pure’ insurance matters including coverage disputes and policy avoidance disputes.

His recent work includes:

  • Policy voiding – (during pupillage) assisting James Medd with a claim involving a landscape gardening insured making material misrepresentations about the nature of its business. The claim arose from a gas pipe explosion which caused a sub-contractor to suffer third-degree burns over his entire body.
  • Coverage – (during pupillage) advised on Covid-19 business interruption coverage for a beauty salon claiming under a ‘hybrid clause’ which was triggered upon the manifestation of a notifiable disease at the insured’s premises. Involved complex issues of causation in light of the FCA test case as the insured could evidence the presence of Covid-19 at the premises at start of the pandemic but not thereafter while it remained closed.
  • Coverage – (during pupillage) advised on whether coverage was triggered where a contractor had delegated hot roofing work to a bona fide sub-contractor and the sub-contractor had failed to take safety precautions which were conditions precedent for the contractor’s coverage under the policy.
  • Late payment under s. 13A(1) Insurance Act 2015 – (during pupillage) advised an insurer on liability for an alleged breach of its duty to pay a claim within reasonable time. The claim concerned the payment of an indemnity for reinstatement of a flooded home and the insured alleged that the delay in payment led to the development of a fungal respiratory infection due to having to live in a damp home.

Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence

Sitting with Alexander Macpherson during pupillage gave Benedict exposure to a variety of personal injury claims arising from road traffic accidents, unsafe systems of work, defective equipment, manual handling operations, and occupier’s liability cases.

Examples of his work include:

  • Public liability – (during pupillage) drafting a Defence on behalf of a restaurant which was allegedly negligent by failing to check whether a customer had allergies.
  • Public liability – (during pupillage) drafted a Counterschedule in a claim involving an alleged permanent loss of working capacity and a disadvantage on the labour market.
  • Public liability – (during pupillage) drafted a Counterschedule in a claim involving a fatal accident and several financial dependents.
  • Employer’s liability – (during pupillage) advising on liability in a claim involving a forensic pathologist suffering trauma from examining fire casualties.
  • Employer’s liability – (during pupillage) drafting a Defence on behalf of an employer in a claim concerning an unsafe system of manual work at a prosthetic implant manufacturing plant.
  • Employer’s liability – (during pupillage) advising on liability in a claim brought by a receptionist who developed a work-related upper limb disorder.
  • Employer’s liability – (during pupillage) advising on liability and contributory negligence in a claim brought by a lorry driver who fell off of the bed of his lorry on an icy day, having failed to grit the bed of his lorry despite being provided with grit by his employer.
  • Employer’s liability – (during pupillage) advising on settlement strategy in a claim brought under the Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 which involved multiple defendants. The claim involved an employee being trapped inside a lorry after one of its doors slammed shut without warning.
  • Clinical negligence – (during pupillage) assisted Victoria Woodbridge with a novel  claim for a secondary victim father’s psychiatric injury in a wrongful birth claim following the birth of a severely disabled child.
  • Industrial disease – (during pupillage) advising on liability and drafting a Defence in a living mesothelioma claim concerning asbestos exposure at a bank in the 60s and 70s.
  • Industrial disease – (during pupillage) drafting a Counterschedule in a fatal mesothelioma claim.


  • Academic Scholarship, Oriel College (2017-2019)
  • Oriel College Prize for Finals results (2019)
  • Finalist (top 12 of over 100 essays), Times Law Awards (2020)



  • BA Jurisprudence (Double First, 9/250 in cohort); Oriel College, University of Oxford
  • Bachelor of Civil Law (Distinction); Oriel College, University of Oxford
  • Bar Vocational Studies (Distinction); City, University of London

Portfolio Builder


Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download Add to portfolio
Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All