Ben undertakes all areas of property damage work. He deals with coverage, recoveries and defences. Ben has extensive experience of very large fire claims and disaster litigation. He has been involved in the TCC and Commercial Court multi-million pound litigation arising from major fires.
In the latest edition of Chambers and Partners he is identified as a Leading QC
- Boots v Schneider – Ben acted for Schneider, manufacturer of a component that is alleged to have caused an electrical fire. The fire is alleged to have caused £20m of damage (Zelle).
- 2 Entertain v Sony  EWHC 1658 (TCC), 190 Con. L.R. 145 ,  EWHC 1490 (TCC) – Ben is acting for Sony in defending a multi-million pound bailment claim arising from an arson during the London Riots 2011. The case raises various interesting issues ranging from the effect of limitation and force majeure clauses to the liability of warehousemen/bailment to causation and quantification (DAC Beachcroft).
- Howmet v EDL & ECS 157 Con. L.R. 1 &  B.L.R. 555, Ben acted for a factory owner in a recovery action resulting from a serious fire that caused £20+m losses arising from an alleged failure of fail safe devices. This case dealt with significant arguments relating to scope of duty, causation and novus actus (RPC).
- Cadbury v ADT  BLR 661,  BLR 441 & 145 Con. L.R. 147, Ben acted for the Claimants against Defendant engineers in this £100m+ recovery action involving the destruction by fire of a large popcorn factory in Pontefract, arising from the installation and operation of a CO2 fire suppression system. This case was one of the Lawyers top 20 cases of 2011 (DAC Beachcroft).
- D&D Limited v In Line Duct Cleaning Limited, Ben is acting for the cleaners of ductwork that was alleged to have been involved in a serious fire at a prestigious restaurant in London, which raises significant issues of liability, causation and contributory negligence (Hextalls).
- National Trust v TFT and Cuffe – Ben is acting for the Defendant contractor in this case that arises from a serious fire at Clandon House, which is a historic building. The serious fire caused losses claimed to be worth many millions. The case raises complex issues of limitation, duties of care, and quantification (DAC Beachcroft).
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust v Lendlease & ors  EWHC 2116 (TCC) – construction and disclosure.
- AIG Europe SA v John Wood Group Plc  Lloyd’s Rep IR 561 – insurance, anti suit injunction and comity.
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust v Lendlease & ors  EWHC 1266 (TCC) – construction and architects negligence, and split trials.
- AIG Europe SA v John Wood Group Plc  Lloyd’s Rep IR 485 – insurance and anti suit injunction.
- Arbitration Appeal No 1 of 2021  CSOH 41 –International Arbitration, arbitral practice, errors of law, and engineering disputes.
- Rowe v Ingenious Media Holdings PLC  WLR 3189 – security for costs, the appropriateness of cross-undertakings, and the particular issues arising from litigation funding in class actions.
- The 52 Occupiers of the Ceramic Works v Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd & Anor  EWHC 17 (TCC) – cladding, service and amendments.
- 2 Entertain v Sony  EWHC 972 (TCC) – Bailment, warehouse duties, contractual limitations, force majeure, and causation.
- Ingenious Litigation  EWHC 307 (Ch) – class action case management and interim applications.
- Ingenious Litigation  EWHC 3234 (Ch) and  EWHC 235 (Ch) – costs, third party funding and security for costs.
- SDI v Rangers FC  EWHC 591 (Comm) and  EWHC 1929 (Comm) – Football Contracts, contractual interpretation, and the mechanics of renewal rights.
- Perry v Raleys Solicitors  2 W.L.R. 636 – solicitors negligence, causation and the application of Allied Maples.
- SDI v Rangers FC  EWHC 207 (Comm) – Amendments of Particulars of Claim, Football Contracts, and contractual interpretation.
- Wheeldon v Millennium Insurance  4 WLR 56 – Appeals from TCC, Fires and Waste Management, and Property Insurance.
- SDI v Rangers FC  EWHC 2948 (Comm) – Football Contracts, freezing injunctions, interpretation of a distribution agreement, and the appropriateness of injunctive relief.
- St Vincent European General Partner Ltd v Robinson  EWHC 1230 (Comm) &  EWHC 1442 (Comm) – Economic Torts, Company law, the calculation of damages, Banking and finance, freezing injunctions, and the late addition of parties.
- Broom v Fluid  EWHC 1266 (TCC) – engineering dispute, iceberg house on “Grand Designs”, and case management procedure.
- Wheeldon v Millennium Insurance  Lloyd’s Rep. I.R. 693 – Fires and Waste Management, Property Insurance, and the interpretation of conditions precedent and warranties.
- Manta Port Authority v Terminales Internacionales De Ecuador SA (Eno liquidacion); Hutchinson Port Investments Limited Hutchinson Port Holdings Limited  BVIHC(COM) 191 of 2016 – International Arbitration, breach of contract, and the construction of international ports.
- British Gymnastics v Zurich, Brit & Perkins Slade  EWHC 2500 (Comm) – Gymnastics, Liability Policies, and the late Addition of Parties.
- Perry v Raleys Solicitors  P.N.L.R. 27 – solicitors negligence, causation and the application of Allied Maples.
- Dawnus Construction Holdings v Amey LG Ltd  EWHC B13 (TCC) – adjudication and dispute resolution procedure.
- Wheeldon v Millennium Insurance  B.L.R. 234 – Fire claim, experts and conflicts of interest.
- Carillion Construction Ltd v Woods Bagot Europe Ltd  BLR 203 – Construction contracts and extensions of time.
- Howmet Ltd v Economy Devices Ltd  B.L.R. 555 – Fire claim, product liability, corporate knowledge and causation.
- BPC Hotels Ltd v Wright Hassall LLP  EWHC 1286 (TCC) – solicitors’’ and barrister’s negligence, strike out and scope of retainer.
- Carillion Construction Ltd v Woods Bagot Europe Ltd  B.L.R. 382; 166 Con. L.R. 52 – Construction contracts, completion dates and liquidated damages.
- Howmet Ltd v Economy Devices Ltd 157 Con. L.R. 1 – Fire claim and product liability.
- Genesis v Allianz  EWHC 3676 (QB) – Insurance declinature when arson by an insured.
- Bank of Ireland v Phillip Pank Partnership  EWHC 284 (TCC) – Post-Mitchell decision on defects in cost budgeting.
- Daniel v Mode  EWHC 3614 (TCC) – strike out/summary judgment on a fire claim at a very early stage.
- Templeton Insurance Ltd v Motorcare Warranties Ltd  All ER (D) 32 (Feb) – Court of Appeal on contempt of court for breach of freezing injunctions and sentencing; reduced to suspended sentence.
- Cadbury v ADT (No.2) 145 Con. L.R. 147 – interim payments on account and “no loss” arguments.
- Rivercove v Euro Rubberlines  EWHC 2593 (TCC); Environmental Law Monthly Volume 21 Issue 11 – oil pollution.
- Ram Recycling v DRC and ors  EWHC 2757 (Comm) – insurance brokers, security for costs, and re-opening decisions.
- Cadbury v ADT  BLR 441 – Engineer’s negligence, contract formation, sale of goods, and contributory negligence.
- Ram Recycling v DRC & ors  EWHC 2464 (Comm) – insurance brokers, coverage and security for costs.
- Templeton Insurance Ltd v Motorcare Warranties Ltd  EWHC 2309 (QB) – contempt of court for breach of freezing injunctions and sentencing.
- Bembridge Marine v Allen & ors  EWHC 2213 (TCC) – sale of goods and limitation of liability clauses.
- Ram Recycling v DRC & ors  EWHC 1736 Comm – insurance brokers, coverage and summary judgment.
- Templeton Insurance Ltd v Motorcare Warranties Ltd  All ER (D) 75 (Apr) – contempt of court, freezing injunctions, civil fraud and breach of insurance binders.
- Premier Waste Management Limited v Towers  BCC 72 – director’s duties and fiduciaries (CA).
- Cadbury v ADT  BLR 661 – Engineer’s negligence, contract formation, sale of goods, and contributory negligence.
- Liberty v Campagna (2011) 27 Const LJ 275 – Latent Defects insurance and the duties of technical auditors.
- Berryland Books v BK Books & ors  All ER (D) 209 (Dec) – Torts of conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty (CA).
- Premier Waste Management Limited v Towers  EWHC 2440 (Ch) – Directors’ duties and fiduciaries.
- Berryland Books v BK Books & ors  2 B.C.L.C. 709 – directors’ duties, civil fraud, publishing and copyright, and accessory liability.
- Markel & QBE v SGC & ors  Lloyd’s Rep IR 77 – Surety bonds, insurance binders, civil fraud & directors’ duties (also  EWHC 3087 (Comm) &  EWCA Civ 790).
- Buncefield  EWHC 2218 (Comm) – disclosure obligations, specific disclosure and pre-action reports.
- RBS Invoice Finance Ltd v Karia  All ER (D) 131 (May) – civil fraud, freezing injunctions and factoring.
- Crowson Ltd v Concept Ltd  F.S.R. 17 – civil fraud, directors’ duties, confidential information, and database rights.
- Hart v Larchpark & Fidler  1 BCLC 589 – security for costs.
- Schmid v Fortmann All ER (D) 107 (Oct) – civil fraud and resulting trusts.
- Hart v Larchpark & Fidler  BLR 30 – Adjudicator’s jurisdiction under the 1996 Act (written contracts and time limits), stays under the insolvency rules and default judgments.
- Bennett (Electrical) Services v Inviron  EWHC 49 (QB) – Adjudicator’s jurisdiction under the 1996 Act (written contracts).
- ALE v MSD  EWHC 2080 (TCC) – Adjudicator’s jurisdiction under the 1996 Act (written contracts and estoppel) and insolvency.
- Catlin Estates Limited v. Carter Jonas  PNLR 273 – Building surveyors, title to sue, and professional negligence.
- Margate Theatre Trust v. White (t/a A1 Moling Services) & AXA  Lloyd’s Rep IR 93 – scope of insurance and deemed knowledge of insurer on specialist business.
- Mirant Asia-Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Limited and others v. Ove Arup & Partners International Limited and others  PNLR 10 – Engineers professional negligence, assumption of responsibility and concurrent contractual and tortious duties.
- Item Software v. Fassihi and others  2 B.C.L.C. 1 (Ch Div) &  2 B.C.L.C. 9 – Directors’ duties, confidential information, and theft of database (CA).
- Re Cooling Equipment Wholesale Ltd  2 B.C.L.C. 745 – Compulsory winding up petition and sale of goods.
Selected CasesView full profile »
- Crown Office Chambers shortlisted in eleven categories at The Legal 500 Bar Awards 2023
- Court of Appeal upholds anti-suit injunction
- 2 Entertain Video Ltd & Ors v Sony DADC Europe Ltd  EWHC 972 (TCC) – TCC gives judgment in major insurance claim arising out of the 2011 London Riots
- Ben Quiney QC, Carlo Taczalski and Frederick Simpson discuss the recent Judgment on the Ingenious Litigation for Practical Law Company
- David Sears QC and Ben Quiney QC to speak at the White Paper Conference
- MBL: Construction Law Conference 2016 – London
- Birkdale School, Sheffield
- BA (Hons) in Law – First Class, University College, Oxford
- Tax Trainee with Ernst & Young
- BCL, University College, Oxford
- Admitted to Gray’s Inn, Lord Birkenhead Scholarship
- Inns of Court School of Law
- Called to the Bar
- Tenant at Crown Office Chambers (previously One Paper Buildings)
- Appointed QC
- Called to the BVI Bar
Ben regularly gives seminars in his areas of expertise. He is happy to do so as part of in-house training. In the past few years he has given seminars on the following topics: Insurance Act 2015; liquidated damages; fire and disaster claims; bonds & guarantees; conflicts of interest; privilege and the law of evidence; damages; fiduciary and directors’ duties; interim commercial remedies; restrictive covenants; the impact of Covid 19 and insurance claims; loss of a chance in professional negligence claims; and the Law Commission reform of Insurance Law.
“He is absolutely fantastic – he is so user-friendly and commercially sensible, and provides pragmatic advice.”
Chambers & Partners, 2023
“Clever, organised, smooth and on top of the detail. He is charming, caring, reasonable and hard-working.”
Chambers & Partners, 2023
“He is very commercial and will always have thought of everything.”
Chambers & Partners, 2022
“Utterly unflappable. Ask any question, no matter how complex or involved, and he will give a wholly considered covers-all-the-bases answer that gets to the real heart of the issue. Also very good at understanding how to get through opponents arguments.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Ben is incredibly calm, incredibly assured and measured.”
Chambers & Partners, 2022
“His advice is clear, measured and commercial and his mind is incredibly well organised.” “He’s good at structuring arguments methodically and impressive on his feet.”
Chambers & Partners, 2021
“His advocacy is sharp and incisive. Technically brilliant and happy to role up his sleeves.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is always fully read in, prepared and very organised. There is no better man in a crisis.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is structured and clear, and has a great knack for putting the client at ease. He’s very skilled at advocacy and advising in conference, and judges immediately warm to him.”; “He is calm and measured, puts his written arguments in an attractive way and is helpfully understated in court.”
Chambers & Partners, 2020
“Very calm, very intelligent, highly responsive, fun to deal with and a good strategist.”
Chambers & Partners, 2018
“He is very dedicated, always on top of the details and very pragmatic.”
Chambers & Partners, 2018
“He is excellent, very good at what he does and particularly good at difficult coverage cases.”
Chambers & Partners, 2018