Skip to content

Use of surveillance evidence in personal injury claims

Karapetianas v Kent & Sussex Loft Conversions

The High Court has found a significant discrepancy between a claimant’s presentation in covert surveillance evidence with that of the the medico-legal evidence in a personal injury claim. However the High Court declined to strike out the claim for abuse of process. Jack Ferro, comments on what lessons can be learned from this case for practitioners.

Please find copy of article here.


Related People

Portfolio Builder


Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download Add to portfolio
Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All